Following our last post about the suggestion that heads of governing bodies should be paid, school governor and e-learning expert Donald Clark posted a comment suggesting that red tape, not pay, was the issue:
“A better approach would be to reduce the time and money spent on outlandish amounts of paperwork and policies that Governors have to chew through at each meeting. Rather than tackle the main issues an problems, Governors are, for the most part, going through the motions of signing off dull, over-written, cliche-ridden documents.”
It goes without saying that everyone hates red tape and going through the motions – and time spent on paperwork and policies, is, for the most part, time not spent addressing real school issues.
But is there an argument FOR paperwork and policy?
Just to play Devil’s Advocate (albeit rather half-heartedly), the 1988 Education Act increased the powers of school governors – and as Spiderman would say, ‘with great power comes great responsibility’.
Assuming that additional powers for school governors are a good thing, are the accompanying added duties simply par for the course – and therefore worth the effort?
Or (and this is the real point)
Do we need to find a way to minimise the paperwork while still retaining the responsibilities?